Lin ZG, Deng K. Bleeding risk and prevention after colorectal polypectomy: What differs between cold and hot resection? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2026; 18(8): 121774 [DOI: 10.4253/wjge.121774]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
We sincerely thank the editorial team and peer‑reviewers of World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy for their professional, fair and efficient handling of our manuscript throughout the whole publication workflow. The reviewers offered insightful and constructive comments, which greatly helped us improve the scientific rigor, logical structure and readability of our paper. Communication with the editorial office was timely and responsive at every stage of submission, revision and production. The online submission system is user‑friendly and the whole publishing procedure ran smoothly. We are fully satisfied with the peer‑review quality, language polishing and final typesetting work. We appreciate the opportunity to publish our research in this journal and would consider submitting our future relevant work to this journal.